![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
| Training Here's the area for posting training tips, tricks, advice, or problems. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| When is it OK to give double commands at Obedience trial I know that points are taken off for double commands at an AKC Novice (A) Obedience trial, but that in certain circumstances you are better off giving the extra command and taking the deductions instead of completely failing the exercise. Can anyone help clarify for me when this would be? Here are some examples (real-life situations, I am sorry to say!): E.g. 1. "Call your dog" -- You say "Max, front!" the dog starts coming and then gets distracted by all the new smells on the ground, and it starts to look as if he's not going to come all the way. Should I call again? E.g. 2 "Finish your dog" -- You notice he is not looking up at you, so instead of a hand signal (which he responds to best), you say "around!". He continues to sniff the ground. Do I give him the command again, or do/say nothing? E.g. 3. During the off-lead heeling, you make a left turn and the dog continues straight or starts wandering off and it looks as if he's now doing his own thing. Do I call "Max, heel!" to get him back with me or do I just continue the rest of the pattern on my own? E.g. 4. During the stand for exam. The dog stands and stays at first, but moves toward the judge as he approaches. Do I say "Ackk! stay", or just stand there and let what happens happen. Finally, just checking on these: -- Am I correct that it is NOT considered a double command to say 'heel' after a halt during the heelwork? -- Am I correct in thinking that, whereas it is a double command to use the dog's name in conjunction with a hand signal, it is NOT considered a double command to use dog's name before a verbal command (e.g. "Max, around")? Thanks much! |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| What you really want to do is get a copy of the rules and use your highlighter. Everything is specified in there. Pay attention to the first part of the regs as that is where the standards are described. The only time you can get away with a second command for the primary part of the exercise is during the heeling, and then it better be only one. The finish is not a primary part of the exercise. All other second commands will result in a flunk. If flunking anyway, give the second command so the dog doesn't get away with disobedience, but know that it is a big zero on your score. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks! I know he is only marginally ready (he did get one leg last fall, but barely over the cut-off), but I figure the upcoming trial is worth a try, has been good to train toward, and good practice, at the very least. I'll go have a look at the AKC rules. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |