![]() |
| |||||||
| Breed Specific Legislation Enough can not be done or said to protect not only rights, but the rights of all the wonderful breed owners. Please, lets all lend a hand |
|
Welcome to the Rottweiler Discussion Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Reading Dangerous Dog Ordinance Thrown Out (PA) Reading Dangerous Dog Ordinance Thrown Out HARRISBURG (AP) ¯ A state appeals court on Tuesday threw out a Reading city ordinance that placed restrictions on pit bulls and other types of dogs, saying Pennsylvania's dog law pre-empted it. The divided Commonwealth Court decision sided with two pit bull owners who have fought the city's dog law for nearly eight years. Reading's ordinance defined aggressive dogs as those that consist, at least partly, of a breed that accounted for 40 percent or more of dog bite incidents in the city during the prior year. "The absurdity was that dangerous dog breeds changed from year to year, based on the dog bite statistics—that was the crux of the lawsuit," said Al Kauffman, attorney for plaintiffs Stacie Stankiewicz and Kenneth Steeves Sr. Steeves' wife, Patricia, said Tuesday they felt it was unfair to have to pay higher registration fees for their pit bull, Noah, who has no history of aggression. "He's just a sweetheart," she said. "And even (when) strangers come into the house, the most he would do is lick them to death." Reading's 1998 law required that aggressive or dangerous dogs, when outside the home, be muzzled and kept on a leash shorter than three feet long with a minimum tensile strength of 300 pounds. The law also punished violators with fines of up to $1,000 or 30 days in jail. The three-judge panel was split, with Judge Doris Smith-Ribner saying the ordinance should be upheld because it was an effort to protect people and regulate care and control of aggressive dogs that did not run counter to the state dog law. Pennsylvania's state Dog Law classifies as "dangerous" an individual dog that has attacked someone without provocation, one that killed or badly injured a domestic animal while off the dog owner's property or one that has been used to commit a crime. Charles D. Younger, the city's lawyer in the case, did not return a phone message seeking comment. cbs3.com - Reading Dangerous Dog Ordinance Thrown Out
__________________ Rockin Rott Multi BOB Can Ch Brandy Hills Foxy Lady CGC TT (AKC pt'd) Multi BOB BISS A/C CFC Ch Brandy Hills Eze v Steinplatz At the Bridge: Roxanne, AJ, Chaty, Brava, & Ebo,Junior, & Odie |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dangerous Dog Ordinance (Pitts County, N.C.) | Rene Allegrini | Breed Specific Legislation | 0 | 03-28-2007 09:26 AM |
| Independence, MO - Dangerous Dog Ordinance | Rene Allegrini | Breed Specific Legislation | 1 | 08-29-2006 03:38 PM |
| Chicago's Dangerous Dog ordinance | RSQRottweiler | Breed Specific Legislation | 2 | 09-14-2002 08:01 PM |
| Follow-up: Chicago dangerous dog ordinance | vVRotts | Breed Specific Legislation | 6 | 11-16-2001 03:33 PM |