| Re: Is it really a Rottweiler? Quote:
Originally Posted by dipper Wow, I read the post by Otis, read the responses and read the origonal post again.
IMHO what Otis said has great merit---I can't believe the response he is getting!!
After owning rottweilers for 38 years, I could find nothing wrong with his post and nothing to argue about ---really.
Are your dogs not protective?? Are your dogs not wary of strangers and aloof??
My dogs have ALWAYS wanted to be with me and I have said for years that if you want to get the most out of your Rottie, he/she NEEDS to be with you as much as possible.
My dogs LOVE to be with me at all times---not possible of course--but they would love to.
BONDING is a critical part of Rottie ownership!!
Lastly, just what did he say that you can not read in ANY standard describing the Rottweiler??
I saw nothing that OTIS said that is not in line with the standard.
What did he say that was wrong??
Rich |
Sure, there was some info that was accurate about rotts, but for anybody to come here and claim that they have been training working rotts (at a supposedly very high level for the military), should have no problem backing up their credentials. The pulling out concrete posts and dragging them just struck me (also) as a bunch of BS. Legitimate background and training knowledge goes a long way with me. You want your words about this breed to have legitimacy and meaning, then don't make statements that "water down" your knowledge and credentials.
__________________ Skip-
USRC CORC Select '07, Multi V1, Multi Select Youth Male Redwood Krest's Shane BH,AD,OB1,SchH2,BST (b.12/02/04) OFA Hips good, Elbows clear, Heart Normal - Cardiologist, Eyes Good, CHIC#39947 |