[alice's mommy]

I'm anal and have a thing for grammer. A few quickies: You wrote:
"There is one thing that is constant, which is the dog was owned by irresponsible owner."
Make that: "There is one thing that is constant, which is THAT the dog was owned by AN irresponsible owner."
You wrote: "I will briefly state the foundation origin of the Rottweiler." "Foundation origin" really doesn't make sense, as the origin is the beginning and the foundation was something that the beginning was worked from. Does that make sense? Stick with either "foundation" or "origin", or some type of mix between the two without lumping those two words right together.
You wrote: "The drover dog purpose was to herd and guard the food supply during the journey. After entering the Region of Rottweil, the butcher's bred these dogs for performance and usefulness in the breed."
Be careful with apostrophes such as "butcher's bred". In this case, you are talking about a LOT of butchers, right? So in this case it is "butchers bred". Instead, you have written that ONE butcher who owned this word "bred" (would make sense if it were "bread" - lol).

Anyways, those're just a few pointers from the first few paragraphs. Ironic, I'm sure, as the majority of my posts undoubtedly have grammatical errors as well as typos. Please take this in the spirit it was intended and re-check the paper along those lines.

Love ya!