[TrishB]

Originally Posted by German Vanegas

OK. There it goes. I disagree with you. You see, pit bull terriers are usually very high prey driven dogs. If those two packed up pit bulls in question were so aggressive as to attack a small dog and ripped him apart, then it is quite possible that those two particular pit bulls, incited by their high prey drive, could attack children (the smaller the child the higher the chance) seeing them as prey. So there! It could happen

German - maybe you need to read what I wrote. I made no statement other than that I agreed with you. So you disagree with me agreeing with you? I simply asked you for your opinion to the question posed. I fail to see why that deserves a reactionary "There it goes. I disagree with you."

The example given was why I was asking the question - not the question itself if you would please re-read it instead of being so intent on starting an arguement, you'd see that there's no arguement required. This is a request for an opinion.

The general public opinion tends to be that dog : dog aggression EQUALS dog : human aggression. Do you agree with that or not? If not - then please explain it - which is the topic of this thread.