| I can from experience as an instructor, totally agree with Spidey. I have had students show up in training classes with dogs that have never been on anything but the head devices. They want to continue with them so I say, OK, let's see how you progress. I have yet to see a single dog that made progress at all after 5 weeks or more. It is at that time I suggest that they go to a training collar and the difference is outstanding. Most of the dogs on the head devices are not happy workers and lag terribly and many whenever possible are pawing at the darn thing. I have watched puppies when they were first fitted with them trying their utmost to rub them off, rolling on the ground and bucking like a colt. I have queried many about the dog becoming accustomed to the halter and they have all said that at first the dog was very unhappy, but did adjust. (yeah, I've seen the adjustment) Well, my position is that instead of spending all that time getting the dog used to something that was designed for horses and clearly is a suppressive device they spent that time teaching the dog they would be far and away ahead.
The halters are chosen with the best of intentions. Usually the biggest fans are those who think a collar correction is unkind, but if kindness is the point, why put on something that applies continuous touch on what is for the dog a discipline point (top of the muzzle)?
If the owner does not wish to train, but does wish to be able to walk their dog without being dragged into traffic, fine and yes, they will serve that purpose. They do accomplish that and I have no problem. If they want to train (something I consider not optional with the Rottweiler breed), then I believe they are less than the most effective tool. They are more compulsive than any collar can be.  |