[TrishB]

When a dog bites another dog - when is it the fault of the dog and when is it justified? When should it be reported and when shouldn't it be?

I feel that if a dog is running at large, regardless if it was the one bitten or that bit - the dog running loose (and therefore, his/her owner) is at fault. If the dog hadn't been loose, the situation would not have presented itself in the first place.

If both dogs are running at large - both are equally at fault and therefore, their owners are equally at fault.

If the dogs are in a dog park, dog obedience class, etc. - so it's a controlled area where the owners are present and the dogs are loose - then the aggressor is at fault and therefore his/her owner is at fault. An owner should always ensure that their dog is well socialized before entering them in a situation with other dogs. Not completing due diligence in socializing their dogs puts those owners at fault for their aggressive dogs' behaviour.

In all cases - if a dog is running loose, I feel that it should be reported. If the owner allows the dog to run loose and to compromise others enjoyment and safety - they must be reported in order to ensure public safety and enjoyment of public areas. Without it being reported - it will happen again.

What are your thoughts?